ShippingWatch

Oceansaver after bankruptcy: "IMO decision was very disappointing"

Oceansaver's market disappeared after the IMO postponed the implementation deadline this summer for the ballast water requirements, CEO and Chairman Kjetil Bruun-Olsen tells ShippingWatch. The postponement hurts first movers, says association Danish Maritime.

The IMO's decision to postpone implementation of the ballast water convention was the lethal blow to Norwegian Oceansaver, says the now-bankrupt company's Chairman and CEO, Kjetil Bruun-Olsen, in an interview with ShippingWatch.

Owners started to postpone their decision to install ballast water treatment systems in the fleet of existing ships, the retrofit market"

Kjetil Bruun-Olsen, CEO and Chairman, Oceansaver
The supplier of ballast water management systems had bet especially on system installations in the retrofit market, but this summer's decision to postpone implementation of the requirements threw a spanner in the works.

"The decision from IMO was very disappointing and damaging for the company, because we saw that the owners started to postpone their decision to install ballast water treatment systems in the fleet of existing ships, the retrofit market," Bruun-Olsen tells ShippingWatch.

He had just joined the Norwegian company, where he had been appointed chairman earlier in the year, a position he was scheduled to begin on June 30. But when then-CEO Helle Hundseid resigned in late June, Bruun-Olsen was also named interim CEO for the ballast water management systems supplier.

While he spent the summer getting a closer look into the company through analyses, the IMO decision was announced – backed by countries including Norway – to postpone implementation of the ballast water convention, which means numerous vessels can wait up to two years before installing then systems.

Hired to turn things around

Oceansaver was, in particular, looking toward the market for retrofit installations, but with the IMO decision, the owners – BW Ventures and Norway's state-owned investment unit, Investinor – could wait no longer, after numerous deficit years and losses totaling NOK 800 million (USD 102.4 million) since the company was launched back in 2003.

"We performed a risk assessment of the whole company to start the turnaround and transformation process and execute the plan over the next 6 to 8 months. The plan included laying off people, around 20 employees, but the owners decided not to invest further in the company, and decided to withdraw," explains Bruun-Olsen, adding that competition in the market also intensified with aggressive moves from competing companies.

"We also analyzed the market and competitors and experienced that the Asian competitors launched an aggressive pricing strategy with significant anticipated price reduction of 30 percent and more."

As just one of four companies in the world, the Norwegian firm had achieved a key type approval from the US Coast Guard, which in effect meant that Oceansaver's system could be used throughout the world.

Seeing as Bruun-Olsen only joined Oceansaver a few months ago, he declines to comment on what he believes the company could have done differently over the years. He also declines to comment on why the company, despite achieving the US type approval, was unable to survive.

A total 70 employees based in Norway, South Korea, and China will be impacted by the collapse of Oceansaver.

Danish Maritime: IMO postponement hurt first movers

At industry association Danish Maritime, which represents Danish suppliers to the maritime sectors, Director General Jenny Braat says that the Oceansaver bankruptcy is just one example of the problems that arise in the sector when environmental regulations – for instance the ballast water requirements – are repeatedly postponed after an implementation date has been announced.

I believe this is harmful the maritime sector overall as well as the shipping sphere, as it eliminates opportunities and the companies' initiatives to innovate"

Jenny Braat, Director General, Danish Maritime
"This will impact the companies that were first movers and which were at the forefront of developments. I believe this is harmful to the maritime sector overall as well as the shipping sphere, as it eliminates opportunities and the companies' initiatives to innovate," Braat tells ShippingWatch:

"If we don't get demand for these products, we risk seeing that several of the players serving as first movers have to pay the price, while those that have copied some of the existing solutions end up as winners. And this would be disastrous."

She notes that the consequence of the latest postponement of the implementation of the ballast water regulations will, going forward, be an increasing cautiousness in the supply chain, which she says will "likely be more cautious about how much to invest in new technology before they are certain that the regulations will come into force."

English Edit: Daniel Logan Berg-Munch

Major ballast water supplier bankrupt after delayed regulations

New ballast water system supplier cleared in the US

Consultants: Downturn could halt ballast water market

Fight for billion-dollar ballast water market is underway

Frontpage right now

SSY after Danish acquisition: "Hopefully 2+2=5"

Getting a foot in the door of Danish shipping was decisive for UK-based shipbroker Simpson Spence Young, which on Friday acquired Denmark's Bidsted & Co. "We're a good match," Chairman Mark Richardson tells ShippingWatch.

MSC to increase capacity of 11 vessels at Chinese yard

Container carrier MSC has signed a deal with a Chinese shipbuilder to increase the length of its 11 container ships, to boost their capacity to 17,000 teu. Competitor CMA CGM has also made a deal with the same yard, report several media.

Latest Suppliers

Related articles

Latest news

Jobs

See all

See all