BY NIELS FASTRUP
The 2003 North Sea agreement, which controls how much of the revenue from oil in the North Sea goes to the state, has – judging by appearances – been far from as lucrative a business as the responsible parties have repeatedly made it out to be.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Read the whole article
Get access for 14 days for free.
No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.
- Access all locked articles
- Receive our daily newsletters
- Access our app
Get full access for you and your coworkers.
Start a free company trial todayMore from ShippingWatch
Torm has carried crude oil to take advantage of elevated prices
Rates on seaborne crude transportation have gone up due to new sanctions targeting Russia, prompting more product tanker operators, including Torm, to sail with crude oil.
Danish carrier fights against claim from former US partner
World Marine Offshore wants former partner’s major claim turned down in case about failed offshore wind agreement in the US.
Russian response to embargo could make oil historically expensive
It could have serious consequences for the world economy if Russia responds to Western sanctions by limiting its oil output, warns Jyske Bank.
Oldendorff invests in maritime IT company founded by Synergy top exec
Oldendorff Carriers has invested in a digital service provider assisting shipping companies with lowering carbon emissions. The company is founded by Synergy Group’s CEO.
Norway aims to activate grid-scale offshore wind by 2029
”I look forward to receiving input from the sector. We have no time to lose,” says energy minister upon opening the public consultation process for the two offshore wind sites.
Head of Offshore Foundations Projects - offshore wind farm construction 
Consultant to the maritime industry 
Accountant - Creditor and Payment. Nordhavn, Copenhagen 
Claims Executive - Skuld Copenhagen 
Head of Fuel Concepts 
Assistant Controller 
Head of Sales and Marketing