Court considers liability in dramatic wreck

A court considers if Mitsui OSK Lines, and not shipbuilder Mitsubishi, is responsible for the wreck of container ship MOL Comfort. A milestone in the case, says lawyer Jesper Windahl, Windahl Sandroos & Co., who anticipates several new claims. (corrected)

Photo: Scanpix

The original version of the article is amended. It is not correct as stated by the law firm Windahl Sandross & Co that the court in Tokyo has ruled that Japan's largest carrier, Mitsui OSK Lines is responsible for the wreck of container ship MOL Comfort, in which the ship broke in two. The court is still considering the case.

A Tokyo court is considering who is responsible for one of the most dramatic shipwrecks in recent years with Japan's largest carrier Mitsui OSK Lines (MOL). The container ship MOL Comfort broke in half on June 17, 2013, with almost 4,500 containers onboard. The entire crew survived the wreck, which has since been subject to several technical investigations aimed at finding the cause of the ship's collapse and thus clarification in hundreds of lawsuits over compensation from shippers.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Read the whole article

Get access for 14 days for free.
No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.

  • Access all locked articles
  • Receive our daily newsletters
  • Access our app
An error has occured. Please try again later.

Get full access for you and your coworkers.

Start a free company trial today

More from ShippingWatch

Shipping in a safe position despite shaky world economy

Container carriers are facing a couple of difficult years, but otherwise the shipping industry looks set to do well despite dark clouds over the world economy, according to shipping analyst. ”Right now, most companies are making a lot of money.”

Further reading

Related articles

Latest news

See all jobs