Media: Shippers complain about new alliances

Major global alliances between container carriers are failing to deliver the anticipated benefits for companies as well as their customers, according to Global Shippers Forum.

Photo: Maersk Line

Numerous carriers have joined forces in alliances to reduce the cost of maintaining a global network, but an oversupply of ships has put freight rates under pressure. And in the absence of consolidation via mergers and acquisitions within the industry, these alliances were seen as the second best solution, according to Lloyd's List.

Chris Welsh, Secretary General for Global Shippers Forum, complained this week that the alliances result in poor service levels, a significant deterioration in scheduling and often poor communication between carriers and shippers regarding delivery delays or changes in port calls.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Read the whole article

Get access for 14 days for free.
No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.

  • Access all locked articles
  • Receive our daily newsletters
  • Access our app
An error has occured. Please try again later.

Get full access for you and your coworkers.

Start a free company trial today

More from ShippingWatch

Maersk rejects shippers' complaint in USD 180m dispute

U Shippers has no case in a contractual dispute reported to the US Federal Maritime Commission, Maersk writes in a response to the FMC. Moreover, the case should not even be a matter for the commission, the company says.

Further reading

Related articles

Latest news

See all jobs