Why EU scrapping rules became a compromise

Major financial interests in poor Asian countries were in play when negotiators from EU countries on Thursday agreed on a comlicated proposal on ship scrapping.

Photo: IMO

Considerations regarding the significant financial interests involved in ship scrapping on primitive beaches in several Asian countries, and the fear among shipowners in several European countries that extensive EU regulation and a direct ban of beaching could destroy the efforts to ensure a global scrapping agreement (the Hong Kong convention) triggered the compromise that negotiators from the EU countries agreed on yesterday, Thursday.

A long line of environmental organizations, particularly the NGO Shipbreaking Platform, are criticizing the agreement, stating that it's completely inadequate because the wording doesn't specifically ban scrapping on beaches. And the time frame of the proposal, which gives the EU Commission three years to produce a list of approved facilities, is also subject to criticism.

Read the whole article

Get 14 days free access.
No credit card required.

Get full access for you and your coworkers.

Start a free company trial today

More from ShippingWatch

DB Schenker defends carriers in red-hot container market

One of the major global customers, German DB Schenker, defends the quality offered by container lines in the exceedingly feverish market, which other freight forwards have criticized in strong terms. Even the high rates are in order, says the COO of Air & Ocean in an interview with ShippingWatch.

Azane Fuel Solutions was created during the pandemic using Teams

Azane Fuel Solutions was established in the middle of the pandemic. Digital meetings and planning over the phone proved no obstacles for top execs at Amon Maritime and Econnect Energy during the start-up. Now they have to set up bunkering terminals for ammonia in two and a half years.

Further reading

Related articles

Trial banner

Latest news

See all jobs