The carriers' responses to the new sulfur regulations have been heavily anticipated. DFDS reacted early by investing in scrubbers while others pointed to a shift towards the more expensive marine gas oil that discharges less than the 0.1 percent, as required by the directive in North Europe, North America and in the English Channel.
The consultant agency MEC Intelligence, which works with the maritime sector, among other fields, has published a new report in which the firm reviews how a total of 70 carriers, including Maersk Line, Torm, UASC and Finnlines have chosen to comply with the new directive.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Read the whole article
Get 14 days free access.
No credit card required.
Get full access for you and your coworkers.Start a free company trial today
Your trial for ShippingWatch has now started
With your free trial you get:
Full access to all locked articles on ShippingWatch.
Daily newsletter and ongoing top-newsletters. You can unsubscribe and subscribe to our newsletters anytime.
When your trial period expires
You will not be transferred to a paid subscription.
You will continue to receive our newsletters after the trial period expires. You can unsubscribe at the bottom of each newsletter.
More from ShippingWatch
Think tank InfluenceMap has mapped out how well global companies like Unilever, Ikea and Maersk are performing in terms of meeting climate requirements and whether their words match their deeds. Ambiguous communication stands in the way of Maersk reaching the top, the think tank explains to ShippingWatch.