When the MEPC meeting went past the three-hour mark yesterday, the chair opted to extend the 76th session in the IMO's environmental committee, which will discuss until June 17 how shipping can contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions through to 2030.
The meeting ended up lasting another hour and 40 minutes, but the interpreters left the meeting after the three hour mark as agreed beforehand. Subsequently, the participants who are not English-speakers had to do without them or refrain from commenting on the important discussion paper that is on the table.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Read the whole article
Get 14 days free access.
No credit card required.
Get full access for you and your coworkers.Start a free company trial today
Your trial for ShippingWatch has now started
With your free trial you get:
Full access to all locked articles on ShippingWatch.
Daily newsletter and ongoing top-newsletters. You can unsubscribe and subscribe to our newsletters anytime.
When your trial period expires
You will not be transferred to a paid subscription.
You will continue to receive our newsletters after the trial period expires. You can unsubscribe at the bottom of each newsletter.
More from ShippingWatch
Think tank InfluenceMap has mapped out how well global companies like Unilever, Ikea and Maersk are performing in terms of meeting climate requirements and whether their words match their deeds. Ambiguous communication stands in the way of Maersk reaching the top, the think tank explains to ShippingWatch.