If the duration of the expanded G6 collaboration agreement reflects the ambitions of the alliance, this puts the collaboration on a completely different scale than the P3.
A review of the agreement submitted for approval by G6 shows that the six container carriers, at first, are only pushing for increased cooperation until 2016.
Americans concerned about G6 independence
ShippingWatch has gained access to the draft of the agreement that the US authorities are currently scrutinizing, and several passages of this draft shows that this is a different and less streamlined agreement than the one forming the basis of Maersk Line, MSC, and CMA CGM's cooperation in the P3 alliance.
The P3 carriers are setting the stage for a collaboration that will initially run for "a minimum of ten years." The starting point for the collaborative agreement in G6 - aimed at, among other things, increased coverage of the United States - is for the agreement to run until March 1st 2016. After this date, the agreement will automatically be extended for one year at a time - unless canceled by one of the parties. But according to CEO and partner of SeaIntel, Lars Jensen, there is significantly more uncertainty about the G6 alliance's ambitions, and thus about the strength of G6 as a competitor to the P3 alliance:
Mere a cautious response
"P3 covers ten years, while G6 covers just two years. G6 could, under the contract, choose to extend the arrangement. But the fact that the carriers at this time have only agreed to two years, compared to P3, shows that not all of the G6 carriers agree that the alliance is the best response to P3 going forward, but rather that the increased cooperation serves as a short-term response. The G6 members will thus already by spring 2015, just one year from now, start considering whether to cancel their memberships and look at creating new alliances instead," Lars Jensen tells ShippingWatch.
"Container industry moving towards alliance model"
In addition to the two alliances preparing collaborations with two completely different durations, the requirements for withdrawing from the alliances are vastly different as well.
The P3 carriers have to give at least two years' notice before withdrawing from the world's biggest alliance, whereas the carriers in the new G6 collaboration only have to give notice one year in advance to cancel the agreement.
The G6 carriers are:
- American President Lines
- Hapag Lloyd
- Hyundai Merchant Marine
- Mitsui
- Nippon
- OOCL
Read more about the G6 agreement today and tomorrow, and find the complete agreement on ShippingWatch later today.
This is the P3 alliance's best argument
Alliances could revolutionize an entire industry
More from ShippingWatch
First dry bulk shipping company issues ban against coal transportation
In the name of the climate, tonnage provider Eastern Pacific Shipping prohibits customers in its commercial management business to transport coal. Ultrabulk COO Hans-Christian Olsen doesn’t believe it’s the right way to go.
Growth prompts OSM to send 150 managers on a leadership course
An equal approach to management and a desire to be more aligned are some of the reasons why OSM is sending both top and mid-level managers on a custom-made leadership course. ShippingWatch has spoken to OSM’s new chief culture officer about the initiative.
MSC, Lufthansa mull acquiring Italian state aviation firm
The world’s largest container line, MSC, and German aviation company Lufthansa have offered to take over Italian state airline ITA, the former Alitalia. MSC and Lufthansa have requested a 90-day exclusivity period to closely examine ITA.
Container lines stand to have earned USD 190bn in 2021
Container shipping companies earned USD 190bn in 2021, expects Drewry, and 2022 is set to become even better with an estimated sector profit of USD 200bn despite limited growth in freight volumes.
Maersk Supply launches charging venture, targets upwards of 100 ports over five years
Maersk Supply Service has established a company set to launch floating charging stations for ships. The company aims to supply 50-100 ports with chargers over a five-year period as part of the Maersk subsidiary’s transition away from oil and gas. Updated.
Chief Operating Officer 
Financial Controller 
Safety & Operations Manager 
Key Account Manager, Denmark 
Sales Director 
Director of Lederne Søfart