P3 worked with a Plan B for its launch
Did P3 go too far in terms of launching the alliance by naming a CEO and announcing that headquarters would be in London? Yes, says the US competition authority. According to several sources, P3 considered a completely different model.
BY TOMAS KRISTIANSEN
The giant P3 alliance was not entirely sure how to present the planned collaboration between the world's three largest container carriers. According to several sources ShippingWatch has spoken to, the three partners considered a "smoother launch" until the necessary approvals from the authorities had been secured.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
Read the whole article
Get access for 14 days for free. No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.
With your free trial you get:
- Access all locked articles
- Receive our daily newsletters
- Access our app
Get full access for you and your coworkers
Start a free company trial todayRelated articles:
Summit on P3 alliance set for December 17th
For subscribers
Global Shippers Forum warns US about P3
For subscribers
Competitors respond to P3 alliance
For subscribers
