IBIA disagrees with critical study of new fuels
![Photo: Arkivfoto/Colourbox](https://photos.watchmedier.dk/watchmedier/resize:fill:3840:0:0/plain/https://photos.watchmedier.dk/Images/article11906147.ece/ALTERNATES/schema-16_9/doc7920hvunznqoq11anzt.jpg)
It is far too early to conclude anything about the new 0.5-percent-sulfur fuels, which ships have been sailing on since Jan. 1, says the International Bunker Industry Association, IBIA.
Read the whole article
Get access for 7 days for free. No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.
With your free trial you get:
Get full access for you and your coworkers
Start a free company trial todayRelated articles
Study: New fuels are more harmful to the Arctic
For subscribers
NGO criticizes LNG as fuel: Could do more harm than good
For subscribers