Industry wants IMO to act on poor bunker

The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) is now calling for the IMO to act on the matter of poor and still-deteriorating bunker quality, IBIA Chairman Jens Maul Jørgensen tells ShippingWatch.

The International Bunker Industry Association, IBIA, believes that international legislation is necessary in order to create a decent and honest bunker market, as the quality of supplied bunker continues to decline.

In an interview in ShippingWatch's latest magazine, published today at Danish Maritime Days, IBIA Chairman Jens Maul Jørgensen explains that the industry itself has not yet been able to improve the bunker quality and he thus points to the necessity of introducing rules that all industry stakeholders must comply with.

Do you want to stay up to date on the latest developments in International shipping? Subscribe to our newsletter – the first 40 days are free

As such, the IMO's Marine Environment Protection Committee, MEPC, will next week discuss an IBIA proposal that calls for clear global rules for the bunker industry.

According to IBIA, a majority of the global suppliers fail to comply with the standards adopted in 2010 (ISO 2010) and are still using outdated standards with more lax requirements - and newer standards were even introduced in 2012.

Lack of respect

"I do believe it shows a lack of respect that people refuse to comply with this. We have an ISO standard in the world, and we need to comply with it. But the biggest problem is that when an ISO standard is introduced for bunker trade, it's not a regulation, it's a voluntary agreement," Jens Maul Jørgensen tells ShippingWatch.

Do you want to stay up to date on the latest developments in International shipping? Subscribe to our newsletter – the first 40 days are free

The proposal submitted to the MEPC, which ShippingWatch has access to, calls for the implementation of a license system with specific criteria and requirements that the suppliers must comply with, and which can be revoked from suppliers who fail to do so. The ports must perform frequent controls and unregistered suppliers should quite simply be barred from operating.

Since taking over as Chairman in April this year, Jens Maul Jørgensen has not tried to sugarcoat his criticisms. But in spite of his obvious disappointment with the many cases of poor bunker quality, samples performed indicate that the development is only getting worse.

More poor bunker

Earlier this year, a little over one fourth of the samples showed traces of impurities, which can ultimately harm the engines. And the most recent published samples, from the second quarter this year, show traces of impurities in more than 28 percent of the samples.

"It goes without saying that we need to speed up the initiatives introduced in the bunker industry. We need to introduce new rules that suppliers and buyers must comply with," says Jens Maul Jørgensen.

Read the complete article in the new ShippingWatch magazine here

Rotterdam tightens the noose on bunker fraud

"The bunker industry is behaving disrespectfully"

Singapore adopts mandatory bunker control

Insatech: Carriers pay 3-4 percent too much for bunker

Dan-Bunkering: Mandatory control just the first step 

Sign up for our newsletter

Stay ahead of development by receiving our newsletter on the latest sector knowledge.

Newsletter terms

Front page now

Further reading